PERSUASI RELIGIUS DAN MOBILISASI SOSIAL DALAM PERANG ACEH
Analisis Hikayat Prang Sabi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59166/el-adabi.v5i1.600Keywords:
Hikayat Prang Sabi, Religious Persuasion, Aceh War, Social Mobilization, Collective IdentityAbstract
This study examines Hikayat Prang Sabi as a religious literary work that played a significant role in fostering collective consciousness and mobilizing Acehnese resistance against Dutch colonial rule. It aims to reveal the persuasive strategies employed by the author in integrating religious doctrine, the legitimacy of jihad, and socio-political narratives to construct the identity of Acehnese resistance. This research adopts a qualitative approach using historical and hermeneutic methods to analyze the manuscript's content within the socio-political context of colonial-era Aceh. The findings demonstrate that Hikayat Prang Sabi develops two interrelated persuasive dimensions: an essential dimension that reinforces jihad as a religious obligation, and an instrumental dimension that employs depictions of martyrdom, heavenly rewards, and emotionally evocative symbols to inspire participation in armed struggle. Furthermore, the manuscript strengthens the authority of the ulama, consolidates the relationship between religious scholars and society, and constructs Acehnese identity on the foundation of Islam. These findings confirm that Hikayat Prang Sabi is not merely a literary work but also an effective ideological instrument for social mobilization, collective identity formation, and the legitimization of anti-colonial resistance in Aceh.
References
Alfian. (1989). Ulama dalam Masyarakat Aceh. In Islam di Asia Tenggara: perspektif Sejarah (p. 176). LP3ES.
Alfian, T. I. (1987). Perang di Jalan Allah: Perang Aceh 1973-1912. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Ali, F. (1996). Golongan Agama dan Etika Kekuasaan. Risalah Gusti.
Anderson, B. (2002). Imagined Communities: Komunitas-Komunitas Terbayang. INSISTPress dan Pustaka Pelajar.
Aristoteles. (2018). Retorika. Basabasi.
Bhat, A. M. (2017). Qur’anic Scientism in Bediuzzaman Said Nursi’s Risala. QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v5i1.1856
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory. https://doi.org/10.2307/202060
Fadhli, F., Ichwan, M. N., & Machasin, M. (2024). TAFSIR HIKAYATI AS A RESISTANCE HERMENEUTICS: Hikayat Prang Sabi’s Contribution to Holy War Literature and Quranic Studies. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 62(1), 19–64. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2024.621.19-64
Fogg, K. W. (2014). Seeking Arabs but Looking at Indonesia: Snouck Hurgrenje’s Arab Lens on the Dutch East Indies. Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia), 8(1), 69.
Harun, R. (1982). Hikayat Perang Aceh. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Herman, R., Mukhlis, M., Parlindungan, F., Lisyati, L., & Nuthihar, R. (2020). Character Education in an Acehnese Cultural Saga: Hikayat Prang Sabi. Lingua Cultura, 14(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v14i2.6623
Jazuli, A. S. (2006). Kehidupan dalam Pandangan Alquran. Gema Insani Press.
Joko Hariadi, Hasan Sazali, & Nur Amelia. (2025). HIKAYAT PRANG SABI SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN KOMUNIKASI PUBLIK DALAM INTERNALISASI SYARIAT ISLAM DI ACEH. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 20(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v20i1.11386
Koestoro, L. P. (2017). Gampong Pande, Situs Penting di Ujung Utara Pulau Sumatera. Berkala Arkeologi SANGKHAKALA, 19(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.24832/sba.v19i2.27
Kulu, T. P. (1980). Hikayat Prang Sabi. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Madjid, N. (2014). Islamic Roots of Modern Pluralism: Indonesian Experience. Studia Islamika, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v1i1.866
Mansurnoor, I. A. (2018). Locating Traditional, Islamic, and Modern Historiography in Patani-Jawi Identity. In Ghosts of the Past in Southern Thailand (pp. 255–276). NUS Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1qv31q.17
Miswari. (2024). Filsafat Pendidikan Agama Islam: Dari Tasawuf Falsafi hingga Alam Melayu. Zahir Publishing.
Muhajir, A. (2018). Langkah Politik Belanda di Aceh Timur: Memahami Sisi Lain Sejarah Perang Aceh, 1873-1912. MUKADIMAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sejarah, Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.30743/mkd.v1i2.515
Octaviani, H. (2020). Tipologi Masyarakat Aceh Pada Perang Aceh Belanda 1873-1942. Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/13904/
Reid, A. (2004). War, peace and the burden of history in Aceh. Asian Ethnicity. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463136042000259761
Reid, A. (2006). Introduction. In Verandah of Violence: The Background to the Aceh Problem (pp. 1–21). NUS Press.
Saby, Y. (2001). The Ulama in Aceh: A Brief Historical Survey. Studia Islamika, 8(1), 1–35.
Salikun, F. R. (2015). Paradigma Baru Hermeunetika Kontemporer Paul Ridoeur. Hermeunetik, 9(1), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Siahaan, S., Hendra, A., & Midhio, W. (2021). Strategi Perang Semesta dalam Perang Aceh (1873-1912). Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(11), 2537–2548. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v1i11.517
Siegel, J. T. (2000). The Rope of God. University of Michigan Press.
Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095581
Veer, P. van ’t. (1985). Perang Aceh: Kisah Kegagalan Snouck Hurgronje. Grafiti Press.
