Abstract
Zihar caused controversy between Imam Abu Hanifah and Imam Malik regarding the husband's statement that mentions body parts other than the back or mentions women other than mothers who are forbidden to marry forever. This research uses a qualitative approach with a literature study method. The results show that according to Imam Abu Hanifah, zihar only occurs if the husband mentions body parts that are forbidden to be seen. In contrast, Imam Malik argues that the mention is already included in the category of zihar. In terms of divorce law, Imam Abu Hanifah argues that zihar is not the same as talaq (divorce), while Imam Malik argues that zihar is close to talaq. Imam Abu Hanifah was of the opinion that zihar is close to talaq. Lastly, Imam Abu Hanifah was of the opinion that to erase zihar, one only needs to return to the teachings of Islam, while Imam Malik was of the opinion that the zihar offender must pay kifarat as a form of atonement.
References
Abi Bakr Imam Aliuddin ibn Maksud al Kasani al Hanafi. (1997). Badaiushonai’fi Tatibihi Wa Sarihi (Cet. 1 Juz). Darul Kutub al Ilmiah.
Abi Daud Sulaiman, A. I. al H. al M. al M. (n.d.). Sunan Abi Daud, (Juz 1-2). Maktabah Dahlan Indonesia.
al Bukhori, A. I. M. A. A. ibn I. ibn I. ibn M. ibn B. (1992). Shohih Bukhari, (Juz 5). Darul Kutub Ilmiah.
al Jaziri, A. (1990). Kitab Fiqh ala Mazhab Arbaah (Cet. 1 Jil). Darul Fikri.
an Nasa’i, A. H. A. A. I. S. (1964). Sunan an Nasa’i al Mujtaba’ (Juz 5, Cet). Sirkah Maktabah Wa Mutbaah Mustofal Babi.
Arikunto, S. (1998). Prosuder Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. PT. Rineka Cipta.
as Siddiqi, T. M. prof. dr. (1997). Hukum Hukum Fiqh Islam (Edisi 2). Pustaka Putra.
as Syafi’i, A. I. H. B. S. al Q. al R. W. al M. as S. J. A. as S. (1951). Muwatto’ al Imam Malik wa Sarhuhu Tamwirul Hawarik (Juz 1, Cet). Syirkatul Maktabah.
Dahlan, A. A. (1996). Ensiklopedi Hukum Islam (Jilid 6). Ichtiar Baru Van Houve.
Dintara Lubis, S. (2023). Akibat Hukum yang Ditimbulkan Oleh Zihar Terhadap Perkawinan Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Dan Politik Islam, 10(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.32505/politica.v10i1.5578
Imam Malik ibn Anas as Bahi Riwayah Imam Suhta bin Said at Tanwikhi an Imam Abdurrahman bin Qasim. (n.d.). Mudawwanatulkubro (Jilid II). Darul Fikri.
Jaya, D. (2020). Zihar sebagai Perbuatan Pidana (Sebuah Kajian Pustaka). Jurnal At-Tadbir : Media Hukum Dan Pendidikan, 30(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.52030/attadbir.v30i01.30
Kartono, K. (1990). Psikologi Anak. Mandar Maju.
Koentjaraningrat. (1981). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Rineka Cipta.
Kusmidi, H. (2016). Konsep Zihar Dan Implikasi Hukumnya dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan, 3(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v3i2.1035
Mughniyah, M. J. (2004). Fiqh Lima Madzhab (Edisi Leng). Lentera Basritama.
Muhammad bin Ahmad. (1979). Fathu Rahim ala fiqh imam malik bi Abdillah (Juz 2 Cet.). Darul Fikri.
Muhammad Hafidz Abi Abdillah Ibn Yazid Ghazwaini. (1995). Sunan Ibnu Majjah (Jilid 5). Darul Fikri.
Muhammad, I. Q. A. W. ibn A. ibn M. ibn A. ibn R. al K. al A. as S. A. ibn R. al H. (n.d.). Bidayatul Mujtahid Wa Nihayatul Muktasid (Juz 2). Maktabah Wa Matbaah.
Mujiburrohman. (2024). Metode Pengajaran Tradisional dalam Pesantren. In MEMBACA SPEKTRUM PENDIDIKAN ISLAM: Sejarah, Konsep, dan Inovasi (pp. 57–78). Penerbit CV. Al-Haramain Lombok.
Qalahji, M. R. (1999). Ensiklopedi Fiqh Umar ibn Khattab RA (Edisi 1, C). PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Ridwan, A., Saude, S., & Rusdin, R. (2022). Konsep Zihar dalam Pandangan Hukum Islam. Prosiding Kajian Islam Dan Integrasi Ilmu Di Era Society 5.0 (KIIIES 5.0), 323–328.
Sonhaji, A. (1992). Tarjamah Sunan Ibnu Majah (Jilid II). CV. As Syifa.